Interpreting Recent Histories

In History After Apartheid, Coombes relates how the interpretation of the Tswaing Crater initially involved an advisory body – the Tswaing Forum. Here, “civic associations” were engaged and employed in the process, some of which coordinated grassroots political causes. From this the author admits that negotiations with these organizations can be problematic if good practice is to be pursued. It is an interesting point. We at times will share authority with people with political motives that will ultimately dictate their methods and objectives.

What to me is particularly “slippery,” is the idea that such recent histories – like apartheid or communism or etc – will be shaped by these type of alliances. While the idea is to educate, tensions arise from interpreting more recent histories – tensions that put a museum project’s constituencies at odds with one another. In attempting to create a unity through a better understanding, we can create divisive devices. Perhaps this isn’t always a bad thing.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Interpretive issues, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s